Montana Record
Bozeman
Zoning

UDC work session comment

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
6

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedUnidentified ResidentOct 27, 2026

Warned commissioners they are the community's protection from developers, criticized black-box buildings and missing design review, and urged the city to hire a design professional.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:22:04 →
OpposedDeb LewisOct 27, 2026

Compared Bozeman favorably to Rochester, Minnesota's gray Mayo Clinic towers, and warned developers will build cheap, tall and fast unless the city sets clear standards.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:26:10 →
OpposedKiki HullsOct 27, 2026

Pushed back on the claim there's no evidence the current code isn't working: human-scale failures are visible citywide, and developers profit and leave while residents live with the results.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:30:19 →
NeutralNatsuki NakamuraOct 27, 2026

Speaking as an individual, argued stepbacks and wall plates should be district-wide in B-3 rather than only at transitions, citing the armory's significant stepbacks as the model people actually like.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:32:12 →
OpposedMarcia CaveneyOct 27, 2026

Called the proposed 70-foot wall plate with 8-foot indent 'basically no step back at all,' cited years of public comment as the evidence, and praised Commissioner Sweeney's flexible menu idea.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:59:55 →
OpposedRob PertzbornOct 27, 2026

Argued stepbacks add construction cost without benefit and could force cheaper materials; said he'd rather see a taller well-designed brick building, and asked staff to engage local design professionals.

City Commission - Oct 27, 2026 · 2:41:31 →