Sundance Springs appeal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Sundance Springs Commercial Lot 2 site plan appeal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 13
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 5, 2026.
Public comments (14)
Argued the proposed findings of fact are incorrect, specifically that trail frontages on the site trigger a 20-foot setback rather than the approved four-foot parking setback; asked the Commission to compel code compliance.
City Commission - May 5, 2026 · 39:30 →Commented on the master plan during the Sundance Springs appeal hearing.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 5:50:06 →Commented on owners' associations during the appeal hearing.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 5:51:59 →Spoke about the history of the PUD approval for the site.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 5:53:28 →Cited the PUD approval history and spoke against the site plan application.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 5:57:38 →Commented on the PUD approval history.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:02:04 →Commented during the appeal hearing.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:04:26 →Spoke in support of the site plan application.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:05:38 →Commented on the property owners during the appeal hearing.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:07:05 →Raised parking, traffic, noise and safety concerns about the project.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:09:47 →Spoke in support of the site plan application.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:12:18 →Commented on the master plan and the precedent for the other commercial lot.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:15:50 →Raised traffic and noise concerns about the project.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:17:44 →Spoke in support of the site plan application.
City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 6:22:16 →