Montana Record
Bozeman
Zoning

B-3 height

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (3)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.

Public comments (10)

OpposedDaniel CardiAug 25, 2026

Northside resident since 1998 asked the commission to cut B-3 height to 60 feet, citing the strategic plan's 'Bozeman feel' and neighborhood integration.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:43:02 →
SupportiveNathan SteinAug 25, 2026

Headwaters Community Housing Trust director urged keeping the adopted UDC and 90-foot limit, arguing housing supply at all price points relieves pressure down the income ladder.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:46:11 →
OpposedMark CampanelliAug 25, 2026

Criticized the 'cheap blockhouse aesthetic' of recent developments, questioned conflict of interest on development boards, and warned against Bozeman becoming like Jackson Hole.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 24:47 →
OpposedNatsuki NakamuraAug 25, 2026

An Economic Vitality Board member speaking personally, arguing B-3 should serve as the buffer to neighborhoods and urging staff direction on setbacks and landscaping rather than justifying 90 feet with affordability or sprawl arguments.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:54:04 →
SupportiveMarley McKennaAug 25, 2026

A DURD board member speaking personally, urging commissioners to stick with 90 feet and noting Bozeman would still be the most conservative major Montana city at that height.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:56:28 →
MixedJim WebsterAug 25, 2026

Bonton resident, INC and HPAB member speaking for himself, suggesting opponents shift from fighting height to demanding richer design requirements — courtyards, livable windows, historic fenestration — and asking commissioners to state their values.

City Commission - Aug 25, 2026 · 1:59:14 →
OpposedDaniel CartyAug 19, 2026

Asked the board to recommend cutting B-3 height to 60 feet (matching the Main Street historic area) and requiring zone edge transitions on all streets and alleys, calling the 90-foot limit a failure to honor the 'Bozeman feel' and flagging a loophole allowing land cession to avoid transition requirements.

Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board - Aug 19, 2026 · 44:36 →
OpposedNatsuki NakamuraAug 19, 2026

Gave context on how the UDC evolved from story limits to feet, warned that with the 90-foot cap plus affordable-housing incentives buildings could exceed 90 feet, and noted a South Church lot advertising 90,000 square feet of development potential — pressure that fuels demolition.

Bozeman Historic Preservation Advisory Board - Aug 19, 2026 · 49:12 →
NeutralDaniel CartyFeb 24, 2026

Also urged the commission to schedule the B-3 building-height issue.

City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 35:04 →
NeutralMary BatesonFeb 24, 2026

Asked the commission to add the B-3 building-height issue to a future agenda.

City Commission - Feb 24, 2026 · 31:04 →